powered by UserVoice

r2cosmin's profile

Default-avatar
  1. 5
  2. 10
  3. 8
  4. 5
  5. 51
  6. 40

r2cosmin

Open ideas
  1. 429 votes
    2
  2. 49 votes
    3
  3. 73 votes
    1
  4. 44 votes
    1
  5. 77 votes
    3
Completed ideas

None

Declined ideas

None

Comments
  1. Enjoy the tool and let me know how you like it. Maybe with little tools like this we'll be able to improve on the great (but rather "static" lately) Todoist.

  2. For those of you more concerned with security, just want to let you know that this query passes through my server so, in theory, I would be able to see your tokens.
    In practice I don't care about your tokens and don't like to snoop around.

  3. I've made a little tool for my own use with a mobile phone that takes a query in the url and displays it in a very simple interface. I use it so that I can bookmark things I use often, like "@shopping" or "@in-town". The "syntax" is:
    todoist-query-tool.primaevus.com/<a query>?token=<your token>

  4. same here. no more votes left but this will certainly be the next thing to get 3 votes from me. i would prove very useful if it would work with the mobile phone version. it's hard to type @shop on the mobile phone but it would be piece of cake to have that as a simple bookmark in the mobile phone browser.

  5. First, I think we should note the difference between collaboration and publication. As I understand it, this feature request is about collaboration.
    From a collaboration point of view I think hiptihop is right. Being able to have "common" projects is more than enough. There is no need even for marking who did what changes. This can be handled by the users as they like it through tags.

  6. Well, the situation is the same in the case of grouping tasks under a parent that has a checkbox. You still often need to know what the task is really about.

  7. Agree, the design is great as it is. Don't change it too much.

  8. I agree with DivinoAG and chrismjohnson, this would only complicate things unnecessary. Being able to put tags on tasks can accomplish the same thing ans is also more flexible. Also, not having an "in progress" forces you a bit to split the tasks in more clear chunks.

powered by UserVoice